Former social media influencer and “wellness guru” Belle Gibson first caught public attention after claiming she cured herself of terminal cancer by rejecting conventional medicine in favor of a healthy diet and lifestyle. She documented the story on her blog and social media accounts, which became the basis for a successful book and app, featuring lifestyle advice and healthy recipes. Gibson found herself amongst a group of upstarts working within the burgeoning wellness market.
In 2015, however, Gibson was exposed as a fraud. It turns out, the 20-somehting never actually had cancer in the first place, and she had failed to donate the proceeds from her app to charity, as promised. She has since appeared before a Federal Court in Melbourne, which slapped her with a more than $300,000 penalty for publishing misleading health claims. Gibson was on the hook for five separate violations of Australian national law relating to the false claims she made, namely that the proceeds of her various business ventures would be donated to various charities.
The scandal raises important questions about the cultural and technological conditions that enable an ever-growing pool of lifestyle gurus to flourish.
The Rise of Wellness Gurus
Claims about how to heal illness through diet and alternative therapies are far from novel. What is new is the unprecedented speed and scale afforded by online transmission. Social media also enables individuals to monetize their following through advertorials, affiliate programs and e-commerce shops. Add to that the fact that the influencer economy has become a billion dollar industry, resulting in a surge in the number of “uncertified” influencers, celebrities, and others, all competing to achieve lifestyle guru status.
Although Gibson’s story is seemingly unique, the narrative upon which it was scripted is common to lifestyle gurus. Lifestyle gurus define themselves in opposition to experts. Selectively, they combine elements from science, esoteric systems of knowledge, self-help and positive thinking. The advice given, which often comes at a commercial premium, appeals to common sense, but practical recommendations to eat more fruit and vegetables, exercise regularly and reduce alcohol consumption are generally followed by pseudoscientific detox products, cleanses, and online services that offer quick fix solutions to complex problems.
While some of these influential figures claim to be nutritionists, few have the credentials required to give medical advice. Instead, their fame and credibility is derived from a series of techniques. These include carefully constructed personas and narratives of self-transformation, documenting their journey from illness to self-recovery. The personal improvements they document online rest mostly on anecdotal evidence and photographs which reveal their transformation into attractive, ostensibly happier and healthier people.
There is no commitment to independent testing procedures and results by objective, scientific methods, which became very clear when the editorial partnership between Goop and publishing giant Condé Nast fell through because Gwyneth Paltrow’s venture was not adequately substantiating (i.e., fact checking) the claims it was making.
Rather, a mix of metrics – such as followers, likes, and shares, as well as attendance numbers for events, such as Paltrow’s “Goop Health” conferences – serve to validate their status.
Social media has altered how we are influenced. Engineered around the quest for visibility and attention, influence is measured by follower counts and engagement. An expert may have credentials and years of experience, but they are unlikely to be as compelling as an attractive wellness guru who is “instafamous,” with a highly curated social media feed to verify their advice. The issue here is not merely about the risk of misinformation, but the techniques used to influence us to decide what information to trust and who to believe.
We Live in a Low Trust Society
Our trust in lifestyle gurus is a direct response to the crisis of confidencein institutions and professionals. We live in a low trust society where the very notion of expertise has come under scrutiny. In this context, lifestyle gurus use social media to present themselves as ordinary, “authentic”, and accessible by positioning themselves as alternative authorities “outside of the system.”
Gwyneth Paltrow and Kourtney Kardashian, for example, both of whom have created lifestyle sites, use their celebrity to give wellness advice and to sell vitamins and supplements. Presenting themselves as our “trusted friend” and equal, the whole business of monetary transactions is achieved as a form of comraderie, as if everyone is on the same team, set against professionals and elites (despite their celebrity status).
There are tenable reasons behind some of these critiques. In the past, food corporations and governments have acted unethically, experts have got things wrong, and lobbyists have influenced politics and research. Non-experts can make important contributions to public debate, but problems arise when there is uncritical acceptance of influencers’ views as morally superior, entirely trustworthy alternatives.
Blogs and social media have democratized information, but they have also confounded issues around trust and credibility through altering how we seek advice and how we decide what to believe. It should be no surprise to discover that the low barriers to entry provided by digital technologies create conditions for deceit and exploitation as well as access and participation. What is surprising is the relatively short period of time it has taken for lifestyle and wellness gurus to challenge experts by building relations of deep trust and intimacy with consumers.
With over 200,000 followers on Instagram, a book published by Penguin and an app available on Apple, Gibson’s message had legitimacy, influence and global reach. Although she was eventually exposed as a fraud, she had been spreading misinformation for years beforehand. The number of people ready to believe that Gibson knew more about how to treat her purported condition than qualified medical experts is indicative of the power of social media influencers to inform health messaging.
Stephanie Alice Baker is a Lecturer in Sociology at the City University of London.
Chris Rojek is a Professor of Sociology at the City University of London.