The Vivienne Westwood brand, long celebrated for its anti-establishment ethos and integration of socio-political activism into design, is at the center of mounting controversy. Allegations of internal misconduct, disputes over the use of archival works, and accusations of mission drift have cast a spotlight on the stewardship of the designer’s legacy since her death in 2022.
Dubbed the “Queen of Punk,” Westwood transformed fashion by merging rebellion with a deep commitment to political and environmental causes. Her designs not only challenged sartorial norms but also called out consumerism and corporate complacency. In her final years, Westwood helped establish the Vivienne Foundation, a vehicle to carry forward her activism through strategic philanthropy and public engagement. Today, however, that foundation finds itself at odds with the brand that carries her name.
Allegations of Misconduct, Clashes Over Creative Control
At the heart of the controversy is Carlo D’Amario, CEO of Vivienne Westwood Ltd., who has been with the company since 1986. In 2023, an independent investigation reportedly upheld several allegations against D’Amario, including repeated use of homophobic slurs and discriminatory comments toward LGBTQ+ staff. Despite these findings, no formal disciplinary action has been publicly disclosed.
The allegations and subsequent inaction have fueled criticism of the brand’s internal culture. Many observers see a disconnect between the brand’s public alignment with progressive values and its handling of internal misconduct. As one report from The Guardian noted, the case raises “questions about whether the company’s apparent support for the LGBTQ+ community translated into firm action when it came to its leadership.”
The internal tensions have extended beyond personnel to questions of creative ownership and ideological direction. Cora Corré, Westwood’s granddaughter and a former brand ambassador, resigned from the company in 2024, citing a betrayal of her grandmother’s vision. Corré alleged that Westwood, in her final years, had expressed dissatisfaction with the brand’s commercial direction and had wished for D’Amario’s removal.
These personal grievances have been echoed by the Vivienne Foundation, which holds the rights to Westwood’s pre-1993 creative works. The foundation has taken issue with the brand’s use of these designs without consultation, most notably in a high-profile collaboration with skate label Palace. The move sparked legal and ethical questions about intellectual property and the monetization of the designer’s legacy.
Corré and the foundation also criticized the brand’s decision to participate in Riyadh Fashion Week, citing Saudi Arabia’s human rights record as incompatible with Westwood’s lifelong activism. Such actions, they argue, dilute the ethical stance that once set the brand apart from its luxury peers.
The Commercial Turn
Underlying these controversies is a broader tension between maintaining brand integrity and pursuing global commercial expansion. Corré has publicly condemned what she described as a “cheap volume direction” that prioritizes scale over craftsmanship. Critics point to a growing number of collaborations and more accessible product lines as evidence of this shift.
This pivot appears to contradict Westwood’s well-known mantra: “Buy less, choose well, make it last.” As the brand increasingly adopts strategies typical of mainstream luxury fashion, its ability to authentically embody Westwood’s activist philosophy has come under scrutiny.
The Road Ahead
The future of the Vivienne Westwood brand remains uncertain. The company faces legal pressure over creative rights, reputational damage from leadership controversies, and a growing disconnect between its commercial actions and the values espoused by its founder. Whether the brand will take corrective measures in the form of leadership restructuring, increased transparency, or deeper collaboration with the Vivienne Foundation remains to be seen.
For legacy fashion houses navigating the post-founder era, the Westwood case offers a cautionary tale. A founder’s name and aesthetic may endure, but preserving their vision demands more than just consistent branding, it requires ethical leadership, principled decision-making, and respect for the very ideals that built the brand.
Share
